Just Because You Disagree With A Cultural Idea Doesn’t Mean You Can Charge In and Demand It Be Changed

I don’t know if any of you have been paying attention to the latest “we must protect our children” social media craze.  It showed up a few days ago in my news feed.  Child brides and oh the outrage.

I get it.  As a white female raised in a westernized country, the idea of being a child bride is abhorrent to me.  So I have to look it at without those entitlement glasses.  Most westerners see child brides as sexual abuse.  The truth is more interesting and diverse.  Most child brides are business arrangements or to improve the standing of the family with the child bride.  Or both.

Improved economic standing is a huge motivator.  Most of the families are dirt poor.  Just a day’s wage from complete financial ruin.  Having children is a financial strain as is birth control, if their religions even allow for such a thing.  Securing your 12 year old daughter a husband, means she goes to live with him and seriously, you aren’t going to marry her to someone else that is dirt poor, so she sees a significant increase in wealth after being married and possibly social standing.  No more searching for meals or making due with moldy bread and water for dinner.  The family also finds financial relief because they have one less mouth to feed.

Then there’s the real business collateral that can be made from a child bride.  You own a store in a poor section of the town.  However, Mr. T comes along and tells you he’ll pay you to marry your daughter, not just pay you a one time lump sum of money, but two more stores in better neighborhoods.  Suddenly your profits have increased, as has the social standing of everyone in your family.

People often forget that until the 1950s, child brides were commonplace in the US and children were property to use as parents saw fit.  The majority of us have an ancestor or two that was used to improve the standing of everyone in their family and provide some financial gain.  So while we stand in judgment of places that still do this, we really don’t have any moral high ground to stand on.  Furthermore, is it really better to condemn the child to a life of poverty and possible starvation than to allow her to be a child bride?

And people talk about the child not being of age to consent… but a lot of these places, a female never reaches the age of consent, because nobody gives a damn what she thinks or wants anyway.  And we aren’t pointing fingers just at countries in the Middle East.  The video everyone is so outraged about comes from Latvia or Lithuania, one of those border countries of Russia… meaning Europe.  However, if you really wanted to make a list, France, US, Canada, UK, Australia, and Germany are the countries where women experience the most freedom.  Almost everywhere else, women are property, especially a female child.

I don’t agree with it, but I’m not willing to spout off about how wrong they are in their beliefs, because they could do the same about me.  Hell, some people do.  I didn’t change my last name when I got married.  My husband told me keeping my last name didn’t make me any less married.

The primary motivation was tedium and money.  I am technically a small publishing house.  I would have had to change all my business paperwork and that involved a slew of fees.  Not to mention filling out all that paperwork again just so it showed my new last name.  And while the practice is not unheard of in the US, I still get comments from people about it.  I can’t imagine what sort of comments I would get if I lived in a more traditional community.

Advertisements

Expectations

If you look at the world from a single point of view, it looks flat. Does this mean the world is flat?  No it simply means I do not have a large enough view to see the curves, I cannot see the mountains and valleys, I cannot see the oceans, because one cannot appreciate the world from a single point of view.

The same is true of how we think.  A single point of view makes for a flat existence, because we cannot appreciate the topography when we are thoroughly entrenched into our single point of view way of thinking.

As adults, we should be flexible and receptive to other points of view, even when they disagree with our own, to help us keep the entire world in perspective, to keep it from being flat.

I do not agree with gun control.  Gun control doesn’t remove guns from the hands of criminals, it makes it harder for someone like me to own one should it become necessary for me to have one for protection.  Criminals are criminals.  If they obeyed the laws, they wouldn’t be criminals in the first place.

However, after the school shooting in Florida, my gun control beliefs needed to be re-evaluated some.  Should someone who has spent time in a mental facility be able to legally buy a gun?  It’s an interesting question.  Because most mentally ill people are not dangerous to society.  But there are always exceptions.  For instance, I am mentally ill, but I am not a danger to society.  Should my mental health history be held against me, should I decide to purchase a firearm for protection?

I don’t think so, but I don’t think so because it applies to me specifically.  What if it didn’t?  What if I couldn’t buy a gun simply because I was a woman?  That would annoy the piss out of me.  It would be arbitrary discrimination… is the same true if we make “have you ever been a patient in a mental health facility a deciding factor in gun ownership,” isn’t this also arbitrary since most of them are not dangerous?

I have never spent time as a patient of a mental health facility… So I waiver more on whether it is arbitrary or not, because it doesn’t apply to me.

Even as I write these words, I have no clear cut decision about it made.  And that’s okay.  Not only is it okay to be unsure about it, it’s okay if someone else disagrees with me and says it is absolutely not arbitrary, just like it’s okay for someone else to feel it is.  Those points of view are necessary for me as a person, because it allows me to see the topography because they are not my flat ambivalent point of view.

This is sadly my expectation of the world, for everyone to be open to thought.  To be open to hearing and thinking about a point of view that does not agree with their own.

I am big enough to admit when I am wrong and on this, I was wrong.  It would appear that lots of people enjoy the flat little world they live in, where they now nurture the tenets of the former Soviet Union; free thoughts are subversive and should be dealt with quickly and brutally to prevent them from spreading.

Then There Was No Sleep

WordPress confirmed that my post entitled Free Speech was removed because they received a complaint.  Okie dokie.  And that was followed by my inability to shut off my mind so I could sleep.

I am an internalizer.  I think about everything, turning it over and over in my brain until I feel like the thought might explode from the confines of my skull to become a living breathing thing.  I realize it isn’t healthy.  But I can no more stop it from happening, than I could stop a speeding, out of control freight train with a bubble blowing machine.

That’s twice since January that I have felt the wrath of a reader.  I was banned from my own Facebook page at the end of January, first part of February for swearing on my blog.  And now this…

In the six years since I began this blog and opened the HJ Facebook page, I have never been banned or had content removed from either my blog or my Facebook page.  But I have always talked politics and peppered posts with colorful language when it provides emphasis.  I have always tried to keep my posts tasteful, even when it was political or contained swear words.

Six years and suddenly this has begun to happen.  Obviously, something changed.  I don’t understand.  I welcome discussion, even when I don’t agree.  I welcome dissent.  We are not sheep, we do not need to blindly follow anyone. I am not starting a cult, agreeing to disagree is allowed.  As a matter of fact, agreeing to disagree is what makes the world go round.  It’s what keeps society civilized.

I expected some backlash when I scheduled my Free Speech post.  I expected the rampant supporter who commented that they hoped I got beheaded to have another nasty comment for me.  I expected at least a handful or more of my readers, to tell me that they support the President.  I expected discussion.  I expected that eventually we would all agree to disagree and at the worst I’d be called a name or two.

Instead, I was punished.  As the saying goes, sticks and stones… but these weren’t sticks and stones.  These were actions.  This was retribution, an action that speaks louder than any words ever could.  It is the opinion of the person that filed a complaint that I should not be allowed to voice an opinion that runs contrary to their own… Interesting.

Let me close by offering a quote from a sermon that has stuck with me recently.  It was written by a German during WWII.  Read it and think upon it.  Internalize it.  Try to understand the true meaning and why it is just as relevant today as it was nearly 80 years ago and I will try to decide what I want to do next…

They Came For The Socialists by Martin Niemoeller

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist.  then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.  Then they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.  Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak up for me.

 

Suboxone

I was in my pain management clinic the other day, preparing for a sympathetic nerve block.  For the record, that wasn’t fun, more on it later.

I was trying to focus on anything but my dread about the procedure I was about to undergo and couldn’t help but latch onto the one sided phone conversation being had by one of the nurses.

What caught me was the word withdrawal symptoms.  The nurse was explaining that they could prescribe Suboxone for the withdrawal, but that the patient’s insurance wouldn’t pay for it and a thirty day supply was more than $300.

Suboxone is a pain medication that also treats opiate withdrawal symptoms.  It is a favorite for chronic pain patients that are having to be weaned off their opiate medications.  As I listened a little longer, I heard the nurse say “I know her arthritis is bad but we can no longer safely prescribe opiates to treat the pain.  Would you prefer us go to prison?

This is what was going through my mind, the arthritis sufferer has probably been on opiates for a long, long time, hence why they are going through withdrawal from them.  However, where is the justice in her insurance not paying for Suboxone?

It is true that suboxone is addictive, but that’s all we ever hear anymore about medications.  My Lyrica is addictive.  My Flexeril is addictive (yep, surprise surprise).  Hell, my father was addicted to aspirin for most of my childhood.

Today it was arthritis, eventually it will be me.  According to the CDC 97% of all CRPS patients commit suicide within 10 years of the intense pain beginning.  Think for a moment; 97 people out of every 100 diagnosed with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome will commit suicide and that was before the new opiate prescribing restrictions started in 2016.

Roughly 150,000 new patients a year get diagnosed in the US with Complex Regional Pain syndrome.  That may sound high, but it’s actually an “orphan disease”, a disease that no one is working to advance treatment for because it doesn’t make them money.  Lyrica was discovered for something other than CRPS and since it is a close relative of gabapentin, it was pretty easy to figure out that it would be somewhat useful for CRPS patients.

So, let’s do the math 150,000 people in 2018 will be diagnosed with CRPS.  By 2028, 145,500 of those patients will have committed suicide – One hundred, forty five thousand, and five hundred of those one hundred and fifty thousand people will have committed suicide by 2028, from an “orphan disease” that practically no one knows about.

Speaking of CDC stats have you looked at the rates of death for opiate overdose from the CDC?  In 2015 there were 47,000 overdoses in the US, 33,000 of them were opioid related.  And of those 33,000 nearly 70% were heroine and Fentanyl overdoses.  Of the 30% of opioid overdoses left most were illicit opiates (stolen pills) and multiple factor overdoses like hydrocodone and alcohol, hydrocodone and oxycodone.

And for the record, 33,000 deaths from opiates including heroine does not constitute an epidemic.  33,000 of 325 million people died from opiate overdoses, nearly all of them illegal use of opiates… So 0.0001% of the US population died from opiate overdoses.  That’s 1 ten thousandths of a percent of the US population.  In contrast in 2015, 55,000+ died as a result of influenza or influenza related complications.  Yet most of use ignore CDC guidelines  about getting vaccinated against the flu every year…

Still, the government talks about opiate overdose deaths like they are eclipsing heart disease, stroke, cancer, and diabetes.  Yet death from influenza doesn’t even break the top 10 causes of death in the US every year.  How can something that kills fewer people than the flu be an epidemic?

It is true that the numbers are on the rise, but that’s because heroine use is on the rise and heroine overdoses are calculated with opiate prescription overdoses.  As is Fentanyl use and Fentanyl overdoses and Fentanyl is in an opiate class all on it’s own.  Fentanyl is more addictive than heroine and kills a larger majority of it’s users and it is often used to boost the addiction rates of illegal hydrocodone and oxycodone tablets.

Just something to think about when you consider the drive to limit or remove opioid prescriptions from patients like me.

Theory of the Crime v. Evidence

Crime shows like CSI, Law & Orderr, and even Elementary portray detectives as working solely from the evidence.  If you talk to a detective, evidence is rarely where the investigation starts.  Once they have a body or bodies, they create a theory about what happened.

Only after test results start coming in does evidence start to play a role in the investigation, unless of course the victim wrote the name Jack Ripper in their own blood.  At that point, they investigate Jack Ripper and hope the evidence supports the five hour interview with Jack.  If it doesn’t they move on to other things, like why did the victim write Jack’s name in their own blood as their last act before dying?  And as evidence comes in to support or exclude aspects of the theory, the theory is revised.

It’s hard to understand exactly why a Theory of the Crime is important.  The Monster of Florence case that I mentioned a while ago though does a fairly good job of highlighting both the theory of the crime and the evidence of the crime not lining up.  It’s actually one of the problems with the case.

The first murder was in 1968.  It was a woman and her lover, the woman was married.  She had also stolen 600 Lyra.  The husband didn’t care about the running around, it is said he actually encouraged it.  Being married didn’t seem to be his thing or at least being married to Barbara Loche wasn’t his thing.  The reason this case gets included with the Monster of Florence case is important and somewhat peculiar.  Barabara’s husband Stefano Mele (maybe spelled right, I don’t remember) confessed to the murders of Barbara and her lover sighting jealousy.  He shot both of them multiple times.  He says after the murders he threw the gun away in an irrigation ditch.  The police never recovered it.  Stefano Mele served his prison time, but at times, he claimed there were others involved in the murders and that it was actually about the stolen Lyra (Italian currency) than her affair.

When the Monster of Florence murders started, Stefano Mele was in prison.  The police and press received tons of letters during the initial years of the case, some reporting to be from the Monster of Florence.  Others making accusations against others as being the monster of Florence.  However, one letter that was received was simply a clipping of a newspaper article regarding the murders of Barbara Loche and her lover and mentioning the gun.

This was weird, but okay.  They found the shell casing from the murder of Loche and they connected the Monster of Florence murders to that double homicide.  There was a strange indentation, an imperfection with the firing pin of the gun used in the Loche murder and the same immperfection was in the shell casings of the Monster of Florence murders.  Essentially, the same gun was used to kill Loche and her lover that was being used in the Monster of Florence killings.  But Stefano Mele was in prison and no one knew what had happened to that gun.

Police had suspected at least one other person involved with the Barabara Loche murders, a Sicilian thug named Salvatore Venci (maybe, I’m not good at spelling Italian names from memory).    So they theorized he had taken the gun.  However, they didn’t go after Salvatore in the beginning, they went after his brother Francisco.  For the record, Italians just generally assume all Sicilians are thugs (in this case, the Venci brothers fit the stereotype and they are all thugs).  However, there was no real evidence to connect Salvatore or Francisco to the murder of Barbara Loche.  There was Stefano Mele’s retracted and then renewed statements that they were there with him and that it was Salvatore that insisted Barbara’s betrayal required death.

However, Stefano didn’t say who had taken the gun away from the Loche crime scene and as the police would later learn, the Loche murder was some sort of Sicilian clan killing (I don’t understand Sicilian society enough to really understand this concept, but I think it was basically an honor killing).  And while Stefano had actually hooked his wife up with some of her boyfriends, his father was not happy about Barbara’s many boyfriends.  So he was nearly as likely to organize an honor killing as anyone else in Barbara’s life.

And with Stefano not really talking, the suspect pool for the Monster of Florence murders grew to anyone that might have been involved in the Loche murder.  In the mid-1980s, the police decided there wasn’t a “monster” but a group of them and that the Monster of Florence murders were being committed by at least 4 individuals.

This is when the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit first volunteered their assistance with the Monster of Florence case.  We know this division of the FBI as the profilers of serial killers in the US and they didn’t think the evidence supported a group.  While the Monster was killing couples, shooting them, most of the female victims were sexually mutilated by having their vaginas cut out, thankfully post-mortem.  The bodies of the women were dragged several meters (there are 38 inches in a meter so just over 3 feet per meter for my American readers who don’t want to do the math while reading this riveting post).  Dragged, not carried.  That is important.  The majority of the women were pretty and petite.  A group of men could easily have carried them.  So why were they dragged from the vehicles to where they were mutilated?  With four men, carrying them would have been faster and easier.  But all of them were dragged about 10 meters from the vehicles and they were dead when dragged.  There was no evidence of multiple people.  There were some sort of witnesses to the crimes, people that happened to be close enough to hear the gunshots in the cases and none of them saw a gaggle of men standing around.  And the removal of the vagina was nearly identical in all the cases, which suggests the exact same person did it every time.  Now the knife he used seemed to vary from time to time, which was odd, but does not completely exclude a single killer, whereas the change in knives was believed by the Italian police to prove that different people did it.

In other words, to FBI profilers, the killings were the work of one person, obviously male, and someone who hated women.  The sexual mutilation was not about sexual sadism since the victims were dead when the vagina was excised from their bodies, profilers interpreted the removal of the vagina to indicate a deep seething rage aimed at women.

The Italian police disagreed.  Pointing out that the dragging could be done to lead investigators in a different direction and that the same cutting method could be because one person in the group taught the others to do the mutilations.

This case is one of the few serial killer cases where there is too much evidence to narrow it down to a single suspect.  Also there are a lot of suspects and at one time, nearly every butcher, surgeon, and chef was worthy of investigation.

The other theory is that the killer is not Italian, which is why some suspicion landed on Douglas Preston, and Thomas Harris who was in Italy for the trail of one suspect that was eventually released because the Monster of Florence killed while he was in custody, Harris was in Italy researching for the Hannibal Lecter trilogy and he drew heavily on the Monster of Florence case for some of Hannibal Lecter’s backstory, Harris was questioned by the Italian police who wanted to know why he was interested in the case and trial and even his whereabouts at the times of some of the crimes (he was at home in the US for the majority of them).  The Italian police occasionally say things like this is more of an English or American crime, Italians do not do this to each other and they have investigated Ex-Pats from both the UK and the US living in Italy as being the Monster of Florence.

As someone with a slightly unhealthy interest in serial killers, I tend to agree with the FBI profilers, the Monster is most likely a single individual somehow connected to Stafano Mele and possibly dead by now.  Some have suggested the lack of capture or willingness for the Italian police to investigate theories other than the one about it being a group is part of a conspiracy because they know who the Monster of Florence is and he is a wealthy and powerful man whereby it would be much easier for the Italian police to make a case against a Sicilian thug or an American living in Italy than the real Monster.

Religion, The USSR, and The US

Here’s a little known fact; until the 1950s, neither the Pledge of Allegiance nor US Money had the words “One Nation, Under God” associated with them. Until the 1950s, the separation of church and state in the US was much more definite.  They didn’t pray before the opening of congressional meetings.  The Pledge of Allegiance was a little shorter, and our coins and bills did not say One Nation Under God on them.

Oh yeah, and kids could get in trouble for praying in school.  And participation in the pledge of allegiance in school wasn’t mandatory.  Which is why I get annoyed when I hear someone say “if we would bring back religion in our schools, we wouldn’t have school shootings.”

Yes, we would.  Religion or lack of religion has nothing to do with school shootings and religion wasn’t even a part of school or government until the 1950s.  Which is of course the era of the Red Scare.

The 1950s were a wild time.  The big bad Soviet Union had eliminated a large portion of it’s population and they were in fact sending spies to the US at an alarming rate.  Of course, it wasn’t just the US, it was most countries; England, Canada, Mexico, France, Italy, pretty much every government was at risk of being infiltrated by the USSR.

Stalin was still in power.  Religion had been outlawed in the USSR and for some reason it was decided that religion could combat communism.  The government voted to add religion to government.  Money was redesigned and “One Nation Under God” was added first to coins and then bills.  The line was also added to the Pledge of Allegiance and it became mandatory to say the Pledge before classes begin.

The Pledge of Allegiance was political.  The reasoning was if we can get the children of spies to pledge allegiance to the country, they would turn their parents against the Soviet Union.  Also, it Americanized Soviet Children attending school in the US.  Adding the line one nation under God was meant to show the Soviet children that religion was not the enemy, Americans were religious and look at the lack of bread lines and look at how much better we are than the Soviet Union.

That’s it.  That was the reason for minting our money with the words one nation under god and adding it to the pledge of allegiance and then making it mandatory for school children to say it.

So next time you go to point out that if we had religion back in our schools these things wouldn’t happen, remember that allowing religion into schools is a new concept and that it was aimed at battling communism not bullied, unstable school children and that there were incidents of school violence even in the 1950s and 1960s.

 

#United2026

If you watch World Cup you know this hashtag as the bid put in by the US, Mexico, and Canada to host the World Cup in 2026.  Which was won by the Us, Mexico, and Canada.

It stands for United North America, and is perhaps the weirdest thing ever.  First off, the three countries that make up North America couldn’t be more divided right now.  The US stance on immigration and trade have really screwed things up.  We have put up tariffs to supposedly protect American goods against everyone, including Canada and that has lead to some economic conflicts with our neighbor to the north.  And the Zero Tolerance policy on immigration is kind of terrifying and mostly affects Central American and Mexican immigrants trying to enter the US thereby straining the relationship between the US and Mexico and the talk of a border wall just makes things worse.

In other words the three countries involved in hosting the 2026 World Cup are not getting along real great.  It has already been announced that Mexico will host the finals.  Canada and the US will host the group play.  Meaning Mexico will host 8 matches or so.

Talk about spreading out the matches.  Canada and the US are huge countries.  If you lopped off Russia all of Europe would fit within the borders of the US.  Canada and Mexico have provinces bigger than most European countries and the US has states that are geographically bigger than most European countries.  For instance, all of the UK will fit within the state of Missouri, where I live.  And there is talk of my state holding some of the group play matches because Arrowhead Stadium where the KC Chiefs play American Football is also used to play Major League Soccer (KC Sporting uses the stadium) and it holds around 75,000 people.  It has also undergone massive renovations in the last ten years making it a nice stadium.

However, Missouri isn’t exactly close to either Canada or Mexico.  I live six and a half to seven hours away from Chicago, Illinois which is the closest major city with international recognition… Although while in Germany I did meet a waiter in an Italian restaurant that knew where Missouri was.  Much like Russia, fans aren’t going to be renting cars to go from stadium to stadium, they are going to be hopping on planes.

Plus there is the added thing of in World Cup the host country gets a free pass into the tournament.  How will that work with 3 host countries, two of whom, the US and Canada do not make it into World Cup consistently?  With a little luck, by 2026 the three countries will be back to playing nicely in the North American Sandbox…

Steam Power/People Power

We often forget how invention works.  More than once two people have invented the same thing at the same time.  Then again, some times inventions happen before the world is ready for them.

The submarine was one such invention.  The Hunley was invented during the Civil War and belonged to the Confederate States of America.  It was basically a tin can that moved through the water using people power.  It had a submersion time of about 20 minutes.  Men inside the submarine worked a crank that turned the propeller.  Unfortunately, it wasn’t a huge success.  It did sink a very important ship and won a small victory for the Confederate States of America, but that small win came at a huge cost… The Hunley killed 3 crews.

The first two times it sank and took it’s crew with it, the CSA was able to salvage the Hunley.  The third time, they couldn’t, they didn’t even know why it hadn’t come back up and weren’t even real sure where the submarine sank.  It was eventually found nearly 140 years later.

Technology hadn’t advanced enough for a successful submarine.  The turn screw system was easy enough, but there was no way to keep fresh or at least recycled oxygen into it.  Just like there wasn’t tempered glass able to withstand the pressures of being under water for long periods of time.

It was during the course of the Civil War that a dentist named Dr. R. Finley Hunt invented a steam powered airplane.  Invented in the sense that he wrote out blue prints for it.  He personally didn’t have the money to build it and he petitioned the CSA to pay for it, however by then, the CSA had sorta resigned themselves to losing the Civil War.

However, the steam powered airplane has been built in modern day and the realization is that adding a steam engine to a plane, isn’t exactly practical.  It has to be scaled up in order to lift the weight of the steam engine, which means the weight of the engine then forces it to have to be scaled up some more.  And the cycle continues.

One has to wonder though, if the CSA had funded it, about the what ifs of it.  It is possible that if it had been built, the bugs could have been worked out of it and become a real force in the Civil War… Maybe… Maybe… It’s also possible that like the submarine, it would have been a machine out of its time.

Like the Hunley, it is very possible that it would have been a dismal failure because we just didn’t have the technology for it in the 1860s.  It would be nearly forty years before the airplane, not steam powered, would become a real thing.

 

A 9/11 Did You Know Moment

Most Americans remember where they were when they heard planes had crashed into two towers of the World Trade Center complex.  I had turned 21 just 2 weeks before and I was at work, in a government office.

I remember my coworkers complaining that they wanted to close the office for the day.  We didn’t close and it would be well after lunch before we heard the word terrorism associated with it.  Since that day, terrorism has become a part of daily life.  Europe, Canada, the US, we have all had to deal with acts of terrorism in its many, many forms.

There has been something very big happen since September 11, 2001, Smartphones.  It is true that by 2001, cell phones had become fairly common place, but they weren’t capable of the video quality or storage capabilities that smartphones have.    This means we take for granted the fact that these days when an act of terrorism occurs in Europe, Canada, or the US it probably gets captured on about 200 videos.

That is not the case with 9/11.  There are only 3 known recordings showing the first plane’s impact with the World Trade Center.  There are only about forty or so videos of the second plane’s impact.  This is why when they replay video of the World Trade Center attacks, it is usually the smoking, collapsing towers, not the actual impacts.

I heard someone the other day talking about how they don’t show the impact footage on TV out of respect for those that died and the families.  This isn’t true.  It isn’t shown, because it is basically worth it’s digital weight in gold.  The videos that show the second impact, were actually being filmed not because people were expecting it to happen again, like conspiracy theorists suggest, but because people were filming the smoking hulk that was left of Tower One.

The most famous video was taken by a documentary film maker who wasn’t there for the towers, he was there filming fire fighters.  He heard the plane and saw it flying low over New York City and turned his camera skyward to see what was happening.  That is the only reason he caught the first impact.  The other two were tourist videos.  They are shaky, grainy, and not of good quality.  Like the documentary maker, they were filming something else when they heard the plane and just happened to look skyward, pointing their camera lens in the same direction as their eyes.

There is this myth that there are hundreds of videos of the 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, but they have been suppressed by the American government to cover up their involvement in it.  The truth is, that technology has progressed significantly since September 2001, but because we weren’t to that point at the time, there just aren’t many videos of the events until after the second plane impacts the second tower and the world had already changed by that point, even if it didn’t know it.

Forget Russia, Let’s Talk Wikileaks*

*If you are a Trump supporter who believes he can do no wrong, this post will offend you.  Do not send me nasty messages about it, because I refuse to listen to arguments about how awesome our treasonous president is and yes, Trump did commit an act of treason with regards to his association with Julian Assange.

My problem with the Special Counsel’s investigation is that they picked the wrong collusion partner.  Anyone from Trump’s campaign, including Trump Jr., that talked to Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange should be tried for treason.  This claim is not without it’s merits…

Julian Assange lives in an Ecuadorian consulate in London, because he is an Australian that no one else would shelter as a political refuge from England, Norway, Australia, and the US. He is wanted for Sexual Assault as well as a variety of other crimes and Ecuador was the only country willing to take him in and help him avoid the charges in a slew of countries.

Assange’s dealings with world governments has been complicated and I won’t discuss them all because I’d like to keep this post to less than 10,000 words.  Let’s deal with Wikileaks, Assange, and Trump.

During the 2000s, as the war in Iraq was heating up, Wikileaks released several documents dealing with US Military operations in Iraq.  At the time, many lawmakers called for Assange’s head.  They wanted to try him for espionage, a charge that stuck, and a warrant was issued for his arrest.  He was living in England already, and facing charges of sexual assault in Norway where he has been accused of drugging and raping multiple women.  Some of the charges have expired while Assange lives in the Ecuadorian consulate, who does not have extradition treaties with any of the countries where Assange has been accused of espionage and sexual assault.

In other words, if Assange steps foot out of the Ecuadorian consulate, he will be arrested by British police and the US has already won an extradition hearing to have him turned over to the US government.  So Wikileaks co-founder is a fugitive from justice in the US, wanted for capital crimes.  So, Assange will face the same sentencing possibilities as a spy with boots on the ground in Washington DC or a serial killer from Illinois.  Trump Jr’s multiple emails to Assange is horrifying in that respect.  Worse, members of Trump’s campaign actually visited Assange at the Ecuadorian consulate in London.

Let that sink in… Trump Jr was exchanging emails with a man wanted for spying in the US, worse Assange passed along classified material that he had received due to hacks against several US governmental agencies, and members of Trump’s campaign went to London to meet with him one on one.  And it’s supposed to be okay?!

Why is Trump or Trump Jr. above the law?  If that was a normal every day person from the US meeting with Assange, not only would we end up on a watch list, we would be detained, probably by the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS, and DIA for meeting with a spy.  And we aren’t just talking about a guy that hacked into the Democratic National Party’s servers, we are talking about a man that released information about military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan while they were happening.  The crime was considered so severe that the US government tried Assange in absentia because he wouldn’t come to the US to argue his case because he knew he would be arrested on sight.

Many of our legislators have argued that Assange isn’t just a spy, but a terrorist.  Yet, Trump Jr. and the Trump campaign kept in contact with him because it served their purpose.  That can’t possibly be legal.  Oh, right, it’s not… American citizens who knowing consort with someone who is considered a spy or terrorist can be tried on the same charges.  If you or I were to go hang out with Assange for a cup of tea, we would be tried on charges of espionage, even if we didn’t give him anything and he didn’t give us anything, and we let the government record our conversation about rugby, darts, or soccer.

PS: You can thank the Cold War for that law.  During the Cold War and McCarthyism, it was decided that Americans who consorted with spies knowingly, must also be spies and therefore, subject to the same penalty.  Which just as an FYI, charges of espionage often carry the death penalty.  Spies can be executed after they have been found guilty.

So why isn’t Trump Jr, up on charges of espionage?  Also, if President Trump knew Trump Jr was communicating with Assange, he is also guilty of espionage in the eyes of the law.  And from his tweets, we all know he knew his son was communicating with Assange.

Thank god for double standards I guess?  This is a big part of the reason I cannot support President Trump.  I refuse to support a spy which is by definition treason.  If you are a Trump supporter, fine, continue to support someone who committed an act of treason, but do not give me a list of all the reasons he is better than our other presidents, because regardless of what you thought of Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush II, or Obama, at least they weren’t traitors supporting and possibly encouraging espionage against the US.

 

Ms Not So Little Smarty Pants

In short, anything and everything

Plus Size Plus Meds

Weight Loss Adventure

Nerdy Fashionista

Fashion for those who love the Nerd Life

C Patt

A safe place for Paper Sisters to roam

Village Books

2513 Bernadette Dr, Columbia MO 65203 (573) 449-8637

Susan Finlay Writes

Mysteries and Suspense

ReadTuesday

It's going to be HUGE!

Maria63303's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Roger Radford Journalist & Author

Thrillers with a Twist

Characters in Progress

Developing character on the page and off

Me and my writing life

A blog about books, my ideas and what I've learned as I live life as a writer.

Not So Easy Breezy

Appreciating the hard things in life

Rachel Poli

I read. I write. I create.

mishaburnett

more than one way to skin a cat

bottledworder

easy reading is damn hard writing

Jodie Jackson Jr. - Author

I wrote a book ...

Adria Waters

Navigating my way through the writing process